Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 17:08
Run Duration682 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 413
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 78.4
46% 64.6 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 43.6
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
363GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 16 3 12 25 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 328
Write 6.5
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 18.1
20% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 36.2
102% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 129%
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 40 13 34 47 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 320
Write 289
Mixed 242
SusWrite 34.6
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 25.5
87% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 36.4
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 40.2
36% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 83%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 107 101 105 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
64% Good
Read 116
Write 91.9
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 105
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.7
259% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
288GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 88 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 90.2
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 137 139 132 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 110
Write 113
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 135
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80
516GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 165 169 165 163 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 124
Write 100
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 165
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
535GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 97 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 99.1
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 13 24 49 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 96.7
Write 126
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 32.7
60% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1.5TB
751GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 7.2
Mixed 6.9
SusWrite 4.6
10% 7.97 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
331GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 12.9
Write 6.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.6
10% 8.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-028.A00LF 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 99U5471-028.A00LF 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback