Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 06:30
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 675
70% 561 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1262) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 74
Parallax 6.5
5% 28.8 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.6
7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101200RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 827 844 849 826 843 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1813
Write 2,118
Mixed 1,746
SusWrite 862
368% 1,635 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60.3
204% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,153
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 1060
794% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 172%
This bench: 236%
Great: 292%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
767GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 118 117 112 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 104
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 114
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
163% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 86D3 SP008GBSFU266B02 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 22.9
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback