Acer Nitro AN715-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN715-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Citigo_CFS
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 12:39
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 64
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 121
49% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 466
42% 352 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 6.3
4% 22.1 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.5
6% 7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200_MTFD 1TB
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 1162 1216 1181 1217 1237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,000
Write 1,103
Mixed 954
SusWrite 1,187
240% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 32
105% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 392
293% 390 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 162%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 86D3 SP008GBSFU266B02 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 17.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN715-51 Builds (Compare 906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN715-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback