HP h9-1180

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP h9-1180  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 02:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 164
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 507
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 37.9
32% 39.9 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 40.1
35% 42.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 630 640 647 651 653 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 895
Write 729
Mixed 492
SusWrite 618
153% 684 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 18.8
76% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 233
179% 235 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 107%
Great: 182%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 0707 GU512303EP0202 0707 GU512303EP0202 M378B5173EB0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1180 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP h9-1180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback