Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion tp01-2337c Desktop Rfrbd PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion tp01-2337c Desktop Rfrbd PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8906
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 13:31
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 70.4
1-Core 161
2-Core 301
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 964
95% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,163
72% 1,163 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 92.3
Parallax 79.8
79% 89.6 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 82.9
Splatting 74.7
61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA1T0QFD-1AX1AABHA 1TB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 988 884 672 428 571 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,357
Write 1,042
Mixed 946
SusWrite 731
228% 1,019 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 26.8
122% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 74.4
DQ Mixed 109
128% 235 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 148%
Great: 286%
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195
471GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 406 365 269 270 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 500
Write 413
Mixed 370
SusWrite 312
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 24.9
90% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 115
102% 160 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 156 139 132 167 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68% Good
Read 92.2
Write 152
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 143
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
294% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 77 74 60 83 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 77
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 70.3
42% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.5
230% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 87%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4 3.9 2.4 2.9 5.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 19.2
Write 6
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 3.5
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.5
215% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 11%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
62GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 23 20 20 26 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 124
Write 26.4
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 19.1
46% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$50
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 26
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion tp01-2337c Desktop Rfrbd PC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion tp01-2337c Desktop Rfrbd PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback