Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive432% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 20:18
Run Duration454 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 94%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 211
2-Core 425
126% 242 Pts
4-Core 833
8-Core 1,444
138% 1,138 Pts
64-Core 2,477
153% 2,477 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 212
Parallax 205
187% 216 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 155%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2855 1134 970 910 949 969 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
432% Outstanding
Read 3,161
Write 3,973
Mixed 2,846
SusWrite 1,298
634% 2,819 MB/s
4K Read 86.5
4K Write 312
4K Mixed 116
445% 172 MB/s
DQ Read 2,333
DQ Write 1,752
DQ Mixed 2,004
1,509% 2,030 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 432%
Great: 494%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
335GB free
Firmware: 3B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2475 2483 2487 2488 1909 621 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
434% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 2,452
Mixed 2,286
SusWrite 2077
526% 2,333 MB/s
4K Read 76.9
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 114
382% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 2158
DQ Write 1,814
DQ Mixed 1,973
1,482% 1,982 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 434%
Great: 372%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 136 137 138 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 141
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 135
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 87%
TOSHIBA MG07ACA14TE 14TB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 49 50 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.5% Very good
Read 261
Write 245
Mixed 129
SusWrite 48
213% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
293% 3.2 MB/s
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 49 50 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 96.7
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 50.4
110% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 1
331% 4.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 6.4
DQ Mixed 1.2
261% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 86%
ST10000D M0004-2GR11L 10TB
89GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 49 50 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 211
Write 200
Mixed 193
SusWrite 48.2
212% 163 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.3
321% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 79%
TOSHIBA MG07ACA14TE 14TB
53GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 49 50 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.8% Very good
Read 270
Write 245
Mixed 128
SusWrite 48
214% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
293% 3.17 MB/s
TOSHIBA MG07ACA14TE 14TB
69GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 49 50 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.6% Very good
Read 264
Write 253
Mixed 129
SusWrite 48
217% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.7
289% 3.13 MB/s
WDC WD10 1EFAX-68LDBN0 10TB
16GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 49 50 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
Read 116
Write 123
Mixed 99.2
SusWrite 48
128% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.5
259% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%
ST10000D M0004-1ZC101 10TB
59GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 49 50 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 213
Write 218
Mixed 124
SusWrite 48.2
192% 151 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.1
248% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 89%
TOSHIBA MG07ACA14TE 14TB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 49 50 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.5% Very good
Read 254
Write 244
Mixed 129
SusWrite 48.2
212% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
291% 3.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 34.2
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 32.5
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,063
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback