Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 8951G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 8951G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer SM81_HR
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 08:04
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 127
55% 90 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 303
26% 225 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Acer(1025 0566) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 10.18.13.5362
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 2.8
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 5.2
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$102
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 434 434 435 437 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 404
Mixed 412
SusWrite 434
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 32.5
104% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$102
931GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 435 435 436 438 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 392
Mixed 416
SusWrite 435
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 33
107% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 367
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-005.A02LF ACR512X64D3S13C9G 9905428-005.A02LF ACR512X64D3S13C9G 16GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 8951G Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 8951G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback