Today's hottest deals

HP 2000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 2000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1854
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 09:48
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 124
46% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 92.3
8-Core 126
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 85.5
5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1854) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 164 53 49 30 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 447
Write 356
Mixed 387
SusWrite 93.5
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 11.2
50% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
219GB free
Firmware: GG2OACA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 80 81 82 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 88.5
Write 87.8
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 77.8
52% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC2P1-B1AH Hynix HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 2000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback