Today's hottest deals

Asus X75VCP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X75VCP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VCP
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130226
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 17:32
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 90.7
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 128
59% 94 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 127
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.6
3% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 82 84 90 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 91.2
Write 99.1
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 82.6
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264HZ-1G6D 1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VCP Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VCP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback