Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900TE 10 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 136 2-Core 258 91% 162 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 599 64% 511 Pts	64-Core 722 45% 722 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 39,219 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.07% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 9.2 Parallax 7.1 5% 7.33 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.07% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2007 821 791 797 798 796 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,322 Write 2326 Mixed 1,442 SusWrite 1,002 397% 1,773 MB/s	4K Read 59.5 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 76.3 250% 84.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,046 DQ Write 543 DQ Mixed 798 592% 796 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 346%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M4SE-8GSSOCUN-F 2x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 27.1 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 40.6 SC Mixed 29 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 39,219 samples	9x
T1000NvidiaBench 38%, 1,034 samples	2x
Quadro P620NvidiaBench 18%, 6,548 samples	1x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	2x

RAM
M4SE-8GSSOCUN-F 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 3 samples	3x
99U5663-006.A00G 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 72 samples	1x
1x16GBSM4S520TJB88ADAFCBench 46%, 2 samples	1x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $69