Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8D
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 20:33
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 187
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 748
65% 556 Pts
64-Core 3,335
206% 3,335 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 78.8
47% 65.2 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 61
Splatting 42.9
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 456 462 457 368 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 460
Mixed 437
SusWrite 426
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 46.3
151% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 346
259% 345 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 130%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB
3GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.2 4.8 5 4.6 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 1
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.5
6% 6.23 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 20.5
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback