Today's hottest deals

Notebook PB50_70DFx,DDx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook PB50_70DFx,DDx  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook PB50_70DFx,DDx
Memory13.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 09:12
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 145
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 332
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 65E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 125
Parallax 6.3
4% 45.5 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.5
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS100T2B0C- 1TB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 12 13 18 15 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 288%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
158GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 4.4 8.8 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
Seagate Portable 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 128 126 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 103
Write 109
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 126
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
183% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 67%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
12GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 10.5
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 0.3
13% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.2
80% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 10%
Generic Flash Disk 64GB
28GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 4.7
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 0.6
11% 9.43 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
9% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE160SO102408-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.3% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 24
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PB50_70DFx,DDx Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: Notebook PB50_70DFx,DDx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback