Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Creator 15 A10SFS
MotherboardMSI MS-16V2  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 13:52
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 265
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 775
79% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 12C6) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2647
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 120
Parallax 113
88% 114 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 96.5
Splatting 96.9
88% 110 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1032 1TB
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11111000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,993
Write 2,143
Mixed 1,780
441% 1,972 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 67.8
236% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 896
672% 904 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 322%
ASMT 2115 750GB
235GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.9
Write 81.9
Mixed 34.5
82% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
353GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 36.8
96% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.2% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16V2 Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback