HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8309
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 21:01
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 193
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 525
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 840E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 81.8
46% 66.1 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 44
45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,859
Write 1,216
Mixed 845
288% 1307 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 60.7
200% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 674
498% 659 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
71GB free
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 254 252 249 250 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 475
Mixed 411
SusWrite 252
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 43.5
157% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 320
232% 299 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 313%
ADATA HV620 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a31a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 90 90 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 91.2
Write 89.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 90.7
102% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2666, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback