HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8309
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 01:17
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 181
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 490
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 840E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 87.7
44% 67 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 43.9
45% 57 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 331 329 328 329 328 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,807
Write 1,107
Mixed 781
SusWrite 355
224% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 55.5
179% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 570
422% 566 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 175%
Great: 236%
HS256E 256GB
208GB free
Firmware: U1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 402 411 430 427 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 417
Mixed 397
SusWrite 413
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 22.7
119% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 36
90% 182 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 90%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
219GB free
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 412 414 433 427 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 443
Mixed 444
SusWrite 419
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 39.2
139% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 319
235% 308 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 313%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 123 126 120 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 87.6
Write 105
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 123
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2666, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 28.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 0P 4R 7G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 16% 91 207 59 144 27" 1920 1017 ACR064D Acer XF270H B
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback