Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 09:21
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 836
81% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,380
85% 1,380 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2810 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 206
Parallax 201
162% 202 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 206
Splatting 0.3
84% 117 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 47 124 12 106 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 509
Write 431
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 105
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 5.1
50% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 1.2
75% 174 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 95%
General UDisk 0GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Read 8
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 1.8
4% 3.53 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 35.8
120% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 32
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 116%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II Builds (Compare 893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback