Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 17:06
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 253
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 844
78% 651 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Nvidia(10DE 134D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.7% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 130
Parallax 110
93% 118 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 95.3
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 444 454 441 450 452 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 462
Mixed 345
SusWrite 446
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 42.4
154% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 287
237% 339 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
325GB free
Firmware: UK510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 101 215 206 205 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 457
Write 381
Mixed 263
SusWrite 216
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 12.1
70% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 45.7
50% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 59%
Intenso Sata III 256GB
182GB free
Firmware: T0529A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 439 441 440 441 444 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 440
Mixed 392
SusWrite 442
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 22.5
133% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 30.1
69% 139 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 95%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 189 190 187 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 186
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 188
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 66 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 65.4
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 64.3
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37%
Great: 34%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
2TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 8 7.3 7.1 6.8 6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 35.7
Write 35.9
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 6.8
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.9
268% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 25.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 20
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback