Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 641 1,109 User benchmarks, average bench 48% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 49.6 1-Core 40.5 2-Core 75.7 34% 55.3 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 124 19% 135 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Device(7377 0000) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	7.96% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 12 7% 10.8 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 12 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.96% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 45 40 45 30 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 30 Write 27.5 Mixed 14 SusWrite 36.9 20% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.4% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 7.1 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	1x
99P5474-013.A00LF 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GBKingstonBench 25%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $112

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16