Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 20 '17 at 21:25
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 128
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 377
37% 303 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 23.3
21% 22.8 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 19.5
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 483
Write 224
Mixed 262
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 26.9
93% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 85.7
96% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 71%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST3750840AS 750GB
299GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 55
Write 41.1
Mixed 39.2
34% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.34
65% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB
146GB free, PID 00be
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.4% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 24.9
Mixed 26.7
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.39
89% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DCLT8GN128S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback