Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 14:23
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 224
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 486
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Acer(1025 1332) 3GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2552 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 41.8
30% 43.6 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 28
29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 28%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 6.8
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 719
Write 574
Mixed 695
148% 662 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53.5
194% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 345
240% 301 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 141%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
800GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 134 136 135 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 141
Write 139
Mixed 52
SusWrite 134
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
483GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 40 39 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 36
Write 34.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 40
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 99U5700-027.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 24.1
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback