Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System GT70 2OC/2OD
Motherboard MS-1763
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 07:06
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 490
52% 416 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780M
MSI(1462 10EA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
24.4% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 37.4
23% 31.5 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 27.5
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 200 199 184 176 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 365
Write 255
Mixed 265
SusWrite 187
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 40.8
158% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 230
184% 258 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
41GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 54 56 53 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 87.5
Write 80
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 54.3
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback