To Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 22:15
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Memory 28.8
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 23.1
15% 21.9 Pts
4-Core 35.5
8-Core 51.1
5% 43.3 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 74 73 77 96 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.2% Poor
Read 95.2
Write 133
Mixed 151
SusWrite 69.7
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 3.5
26% 8.1 MB/s
DQ Read 97.9
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 134
94% 117 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 93%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
7GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 43 48 54 52 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 27.7
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 47
30% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33
39GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.1 9.1 7.6 31 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 65.6
Write 58.7
Mixed 44
SusWrite 20.5
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 60%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 1TB
687GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 54 71 78 88 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 143
Write 120
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 73.5
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
87GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 44 49 50 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 32.8
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 44.9
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33
41GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 31 36 41 40 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 55.4
Write 57
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 36.1
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 15 16 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 21.5
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 14.9
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 104%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
377GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 11 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 20
Write 21.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 11.9
26% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 262
15% 262 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback