Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 00:54
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 39.5
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 127
40% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 174
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 88.8
49% 70.9 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 46.7
46% 57.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 342 356 337 296 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 452
Write 382
Mixed 368
SusWrite 323
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 34.9
122% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 295
222% 300 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
141GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 81 80 77 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44% Average
Read 74.3
Write 66.9
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 79.1
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R748G2400U2S-UO 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback