Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E3300-$62 2,428 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Memory 53.9 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 77.3 35% 56.3 Pts	4-Core 61.1 8-Core 70 9% 65.6 Pts	64-Core 76.8 5% 76.8 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 4.1 5.1 2.8 6.8 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 112 Write 119 Mixed 54.9 SusWrite 6.4 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 113%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80 11,055 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 226GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 5.5 5.7 3.5 9 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 79.1 Write 77.8 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 10.5 42% 56.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 2x2GB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM