Today's hottest deals

HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 09:33
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 167
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 607
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 42.7
30% 40 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$110
434GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 414 399 402 421 423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 445
Write 420
Mixed 399
SusWrite 410
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 26.3
90% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 174
130% 173 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 128%
SPCCSolidStateDisk 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 113 117 125 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 64GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 41.9
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback