Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 18:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 201
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 387
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 6.1
5% 18.6 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 10
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 412 410 420 433 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 408
Mixed 415
SusWrite 416
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 54.1
181% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 274
228% 330 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
699GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 104 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 129
Write 117
Mixed 73
SusWrite 104
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 23.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback