Asrock 870iCafe R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 870iCafe R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 16:33
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 93.4
40% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 183
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365C) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 9.5
7% 9.03 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
56GB free
Firmware: S9FM01.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 75 76 77 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 343
Write 87.2
Mixed 121
SusWrite 73.9
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 11.9
66% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 67.7
DQ Mixed 16.2
21% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
861GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 75 76 77 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 73.9
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
904GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 94 98 94 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 83.7
Write 107
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 92.9
68% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 69%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4 3.7 9.3 8.6 9.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Read 10.4
Write 9
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 6.4
9% 7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
33% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1339U2 HU524303EP0200 HU524303EP0200 HU524303EP0200 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870iCafe R2.0 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870iCafe R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $57
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback