Asrock X79 Extreme4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 13:09
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 573
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.1% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 51.1
32% 42.7 fps
MRender 54.2
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 38.6
38% 47.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 96 122 119 118 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64% Good
Read 455
Write 381
Mixed 354
SusWrite 137
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 25
86% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 193
156% 225 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
885GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 188 189 187 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 142
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 187
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 167 168 169 168 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 132
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 167
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8G F3-2400C11-8G Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A240 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A240 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 31.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback