Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8575
Memory	52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210706
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 189 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 504 50% 410 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 8575) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 56.9 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 50.3 46% 56 fps	Gravity 49.8 Splatting 47.8 43% 48.8 fps
Poor: 28% Great: 46%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8575) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 8.6 Parallax 7.4 5% 7.33 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 9.8 7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$102 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 806GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1387 1453 1466 1397 1426 1479 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 1,842 Write 1,925 Mixed 1,887 SusWrite 1,435 400% 1,772 MB/s	4K Read 58.9 4K Write 95.8 4K Mixed 77.6 239% 77.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,091 DQ Write 675 DQ Mixed 817 626% 861 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 488%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 929GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 370 372 367 371 380 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 439 Write 439 Mixed 425 SusWrite 369 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 45.8 138% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 342 255% 338 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 2x31.5GB 375 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.8% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 22.6 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 22.2 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	1,163x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	927x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	454x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	336x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	271x
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 173%, 3,049 samples	191x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	670x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	224x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples	172x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16