Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 21:13
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 148
60% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 467
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 16.9
15% 17.6 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 19
Splatting 15.6
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,726
Write 707
Mixed 546
216% 993 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 54.9
182% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 456
334% 439 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 213%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
459GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 112 112 111 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 111
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
161GB free
Firmware: GG2OAE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 69 67 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 82.1
Write 83.6
Mixed 31
SusWrite 67.2
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5270CH0- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.4% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback