Hp-pavilion WC963AA-ABF p6355fr

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion WC963AA-ABF p6355fr  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 19:14
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 111
54% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 199
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 8414) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 35
Parallax 41.6
24% 35.3 fps
MRender 46.1
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 34.6
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 129 50 21 44 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 238
Write 222
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 71.4
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 1
34% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 42.1
47% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
164GB free
Firmware: 3.AHB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 86 86 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 87
Write 51.2
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 83.3
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5458-001.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WC963AA-ABF p6355fr Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion WC963AA-ABF p6355fr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback