Acer Aspire M5800/M3800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire M5800/M3800  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EG43M
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090811
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 01 '17 at 22:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$131
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 70.1
40% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 132
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 024C)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.59
1% 0.61 fps
MRender 0.52
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.87
0% 0.62 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
298GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 71.9
Write 67.3
Mixed 72.3
53% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.34
111% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 93.1
Mixed 83.8
71% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.5
119% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5458-001.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5800/M3800 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5800/M3800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback