Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 19:15
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4350-$45
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 148
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 214
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Gigabyte(1458 352F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 267.42
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.8
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500G 500GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 237 241 247 280 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 410
Write 297
Mixed 331
SusWrite 254
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 58.9
172% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 194
158% 223 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 121%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
133GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 182 172 177 174 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 366
Write 254
Mixed 279
SusWrite 183
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 26.2
104% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 157
141% 213 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback