Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 116 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 40.6 1-Core 16 2-Core 29.7 20% 28.8 Pts	4-Core 30.3 8-Core 29.6 4% 30 Pts	64-Core 21.1 1% 21.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9806) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.83% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.83% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 85 150 144 100 126 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.1% Poor	Read 124 Write 138 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 126 25% 109 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 11.5 27% 9.13 MB/s	DQ Read 8.9 DQ Write 16.2 DQ Mixed 12.2 9% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 99%
Generic External 500GB 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 136GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 16 25 26 23 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 25.3 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 23.5 32% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37352E4138344445 2x2GB 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.17% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1.2 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25