TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus EX-B560M-V5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus EX-B560M-V5  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 14:12
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 770
77% 628 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 92%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.3% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 60.7
Parallax 88.8
48% 69.7 fps
MRender 60.5
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 44.3
45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 47.3%
 Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8 2280/256G 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 53 51 45 52 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 483
Write 366
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 106
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 33.5%
 Great: 82%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
57GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 85.7
Write 91.4
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 68.7
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 44.4%
 Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
432GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 177 178 178 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 125
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 178
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 97.8%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB3A/8-SP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 11.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 46.4%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EX-B560M-V5 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus EX-B560M-V5

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples54x
Core i5-11400Intel  $119Bench 94%, 24,459 samples46x
Core i5-10400Intel  $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples29x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples18x
UHD Graphics 730IntelBench 6%, 14,644 samples13x
SSD
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples11x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD  $95Bench 204%, 97,624 samples8x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples7x
RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples15x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples12x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback