Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700-$229 71,010 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 89.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 309 95% 178 Pts	4-Core 606 8-Core 1,062 101% 834 Pts	64-Core 1,638 101% 1,638 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 41.6 Parallax 38.4 30% 38.9 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 39 Splatting 27.6 28% 35 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8 2280/256G 256GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 335 365 440 442 440 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 438 Write 419 Mixed 346 SusWrite 391 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 19 106% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 23.1 72% 148 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 82%
Kingston SA400S37/240G 240GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 223GB free Firmware: T0818A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 450 447 450 451 452 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 443 Mixed 410 SusWrite 452 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 27.6 128% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 44.2 83% 158 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 86%
DISK 16GB 864 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 10GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.5 6.2 5.9 6.7 5.8 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.39% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 2 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 6.1 6% 6.38 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.39% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 1x16GB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 10.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 14.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 142%

UFO

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	666x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	454x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	345x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	927x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	545x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	308x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16