Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 23:20
Run Duration581 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 334
104% 195 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,087
105% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,504
93% 1,504 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Gigabyte(1458 407B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 125
Parallax 130
116% 132 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 108
Splatting 93.8
91% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1957 1100 1099 1078 1086 1084 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,455
Write 2,446
Mixed 1,689
SusWrite 1,234
387% 1,706 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 72.6
239% 90.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,285
DQ Write 1,002
DQ Mixed 1,147
857% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 259%
Great: 303%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$50
224GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 27 15 138 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,444
Write 1,229
Mixed 941
SusWrite 206
213% 955 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 65.9
234% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 578
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 265
304% 516 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 171%
Great: 255%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 196 188 199 196 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 158
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 195
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.6
361% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 125 126 132 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 68 67 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 58.9
Write 79.4
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 68.1
91% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 79.3
Write 73.5
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 74.8
94% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.7
230% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 59%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 96.4
Write 116
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 0.5
94% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 64 62 64 63 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 128
Write 143
Mixed 104
SusWrite 64
146% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.4 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 154
Write 167
Mixed 110
SusWrite 2
138% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 62%
HUH72808 0ALE601 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 64 63 64 63 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
Read 163
Write 193
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 64.5
164% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1
214% 2.3 MB/s
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
809GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 118
Write 63.1
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 65.4
97% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.5
326% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 0.5
294% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 86%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
399GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 114
Write 75.3
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 65.5
98% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.5
298% 3.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 0.4
324% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 86%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 73 73 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 162
Write 152
Mixed 115
SusWrite 72.4
163% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 73 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 135
Write 149
Mixed 114
SusWrite 72.4
157% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 23 23 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 142
Write 146
Mixed 116
SusWrite 23.4
138% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
646GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 23 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 129
Write 140
Mixed 114
SusWrite 23.2
133% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 23 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 102
SusWrite 23.1
120% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 66%
HUH72808 0ALE601 8TB
7.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 67 68 69 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
Read 155
Write 192
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 69.5
164% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%
WDC WD40 EMRX-82UZ0N0 4TB
617GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 72 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 159
Write 157
Mixed 123
SusWrite 72.4
168% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA MG03ACA400 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 72 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 104
Write 124
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 71.3
121% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 57%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
468GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 103
Write 105
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 0.5
96% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 47%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
354GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 149
Write 128
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 0.5
111% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3200 CL16-18-18D4-3200 CL16-18-18 D4-3200 CL16-18-18 D4-3200 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 35.4
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 33.3
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback