Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH317-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Vellfire_CMS
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201125
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 13:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 180
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 428
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Acer(1025 147D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.4% Below average
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 49.1
29% 50 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 56.3
35% 40.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 465 519 508 519 506 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,071
Write 2,039
Mixed 1540
SusWrite 597
298% 1,312 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 51
167% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 394
316% 452 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 153%
Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 23.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-54 Builds (Compare 713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback