Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PT315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PT315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Hatch_CMS
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200427
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 07:30
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 240
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 710
69% 566 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Acer(1025 1446) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 109
Parallax 111
90% 110 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 104
Splatting 96
90% 113 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 966 971 888 673 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 1,733
Mixed 1,348
SusWrite 834
294% 1,302 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 45.2
151% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 532
402% 544 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 174%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.1% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 15.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PT315-52 Builds (Compare 772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PT315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback