Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 22:44
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 218
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 696
67% 552 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 46
26% 37.3 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 34.6
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190429a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 100 57 57 70 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 461
Write 84.2
Mixed 138
SusWrite 69.4
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 33
99% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 114
86% 118 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 101%
MB0500GCEHE 500GB
311GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 123
Write 122
Mixed 114
SusWrite 117
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4RL.8FE 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 56.3
MC Mixed 41.8
134% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 21.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Gaming 5P Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $698
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback