Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC7i3BNB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel NUC7i3BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i3BNB  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 02:46
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 48
2-Core 85.6
47% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 127
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 78 76 74 74 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 356
Write 87.7
Mixed 141
SusWrite 75.6
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 28.1
90% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 74.4
DQ Mixed 38.7
48% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate One Touch w/PW 2TB
398GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 97 93 92 70 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 8
Write 19.5
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 75.6
20% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 71%
Generic Mass-Storage 64GB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 15 10 14 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 16.4
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 13.4
21% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.1
124% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2400HSB-8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20.8
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i3BNB Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i3BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback