bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091013
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateSep 27 '17 at 07:57
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5606
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 100
44% 72 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 90.7
13% 96.8 Pts
64-Core 87.5
5% 87.5 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 34GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.9% Very poor
Read 73.9
Write 60.6
Mixed 33.5
12% 56 MB/s
4K Read 5.94
4K Write 8.65
4K Mixed 6.45
22% 7.01 MB/s
DQ Read 59.8
DQ Write 6.24
DQ Mixed 28.6
22% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 89%
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 76.4
Write 57.8
Mixed 59.6
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.24
4K Write 7.14
4K Mixed 2.05
536% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 15 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback