Juniper 28044 MS3 MAIN PCBA (256GB eMMC, 8GB RAM)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJuniper 28044 MS3 MAIN PCBA (256GB eMMC, 8GB RAM)  (all builds)
MotherboardJuniper Mesa3
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 23:26
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Memory 11.8
1-Core 19.9
2-Core 39.5
13% 23.7 Pts
4-Core 66.1
8-Core 71.8
9% 68.9 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.8
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.6
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 387
10% 387 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback