Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 158 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 308 42% 310 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	6.67% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 8.2 Parallax 7.4 7% 7.9 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 8.6 7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.67% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 394GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 109 97 106 105 105 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 8.2 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 102 37% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown E30112A 1x4GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	29x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	28x
Radeon HD 6350ATIBench 1%, 241 samples	26x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 27%, 1,002 samples	39x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 49%, 2,386 samples	34x
M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 46%, 948 samples	22x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16