Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG Strix GA35DX_G35DX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Strix GA35DX_G35DX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GA35DX
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 06:00
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 293
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,010
95% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,419
88% 1,419 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.20
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (161 fps cap detected)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 161
Parallax 161
131% 161 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 144
Splatting 120
114% 142 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 120%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 255 152 162 201 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 1,391
Write 1,652
Mixed 1,132
SusWrite 211
246% 1,097 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 0.4
50% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 89
DQ Mixed 702
352% 275 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 438%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
28GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 506
Write 176
Mixed 322
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 58.9
195% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung MZVKV512HAJH-000L1 512GB
366GB free
Firmware: 6L0QBXX7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1422 1416 1420 1421 1421 1420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,655
Write 1,434
Mixed 846
SusWrite 1,420
300% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 63.5
230% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 470
436% 697 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 260%
Great: 260%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 178 175 177 176 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 137
Write 69.6
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 176
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 32.3
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 35.8
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG Strix GA35DX_G35DX Builds (Compare 733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

System: Asus ROG Strix GA35DX_G35DX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback