Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 01:49
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 891
84% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,285
80% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22F3) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 21.5
13% 22 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 20
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDEZS25-480G-Z01 480GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EG870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 151 203 213 213 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 452
Write 360
Mixed 188
SusWrite 219
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 8.3
68% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 2.4
27% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
8GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 39.2
Write 24.2
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 24.8
37% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 5.5
464% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 32.5
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 31.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback