Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 21:18
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$127
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 168
2-Core 314
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 944
95% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
EVGA(3842 4297) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Lighting 298
Reflection 256
Parallax 301
243% 285 fps
MRender 324
Gravity 242
Splatting 173
193% 246 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 201%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,594
Write 2352
Mixed 1,572
482% 2,172 MB/s
4K Read 71.8
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 102
353% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,454
DQ Write 1,231
DQ Mixed 1,307
989% 1,331 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SDEZS25-480G-Z01 480GB
230GB free
Firmware: EG870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 214 220 203 211 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 456
Write 344
Mixed 316
SusWrite 232
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 15.9
77% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 87.6
DQ Mixed 32.2
43% 78.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 33.3
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 33.8
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback