HP 120-011IN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 120-011IN  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B34
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 10:32
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 154
57% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 138
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2B34) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.47 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 45 51 79 75 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 141
Write 135
Mixed 62
SusWrite 64
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M391B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 120-011IN Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 120-011IN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback