Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 94.6 2-Core 154 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 336 42% 316 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8767) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 68.7 0% 46.9 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 69.2 Splatting 54.3 50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 111 105 103 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 132 Write 153 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 107 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 105% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DATEN 4G4D24 08B6 MD401GNSE-CB3M2 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.6% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 18.5 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 17.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	4x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	1x

RAM
F6451U64F9333G 08B6 MD3512NSA-HA3G1 8GBSamsungBench 32%, 4 samples	2x
DATEN 4G4D24 08B6 MD401GNSE-CB3M2 12GBUnknownBench 54%, 3 samples	2x
TMT351U6EFR8C-PBHJ 1x4GBTeikonBench 30%, 127 samples	1x

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $98