Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20255

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20255  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505s
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 07:46
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 41.4
2-Core 75.6
37% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 113
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Legend(17AA 397C) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.83 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 331 334 340 312 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 365
Write 348
Mixed 285
SusWrite 324
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 31.7
111% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 152
117% 158 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DX0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20255 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20255

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback